On July 9, 2025, the caller’s granddaughter experienced a fall at a Circle K convenience store located in the Orlando/Sanford area of Florida. According to the caller, no immediate medical assistance was sought, and no ambulance was called to the scene. The incident was not formally addressed by the store staff, and no security footage or photographic evidence of the fall is available at this time. The caller, acting on behalf of her granddaughter, is seeking legal assistance to explore potential compensation for the fall and any resulting injuries. No prior legal help has been obtained, and the case has not yet been formally reviewed. The family is hoping to speak with an attorney to assess whether a premises liability claim can be pursued based on the circumstances described.

In February 2023, in Cleveland, Ohio, the claimant was leaving a privately owned, paid parking lot attached to a concert venue when an automatic gate malfunctioned and closed on the passenger side of their 2020 Toyota RAV4, causing significant damage. The claimant promptly reported the incident to the parking lot management and obtained both photographic evidence and a verbal recording of a parking lot attendant acknowledging that this malfunction had occurred on at least three previous occasions—demonstrating the property owner’s prior knowledge of the hazard. Despite attempts to resolve the matter through direct communication, the property management was unresponsive until a family member (an attorney) intervened via email. Ultimately, the claimant was forced to file a claim through GEICO, paying a $500 deductible and enduring an extended delay in vehicle repairs. The claimant is now seeking legal representation to pursue recovery of the deductible, compensation for the prolonged inconvenience, reimbursement for the diminished value of the vehicle following repairs, and additional damages due to the property owner’s negligence and failure to act despite prior incidents.

The claimant, based in Jacksonville, Florida, reports ongoing mistreatment spanning approximately four years due to alleged failure of proper representation by their union. The claimant feels they have been consistently misrepresented and mistreated in a workplace context, with efforts to seek help reportedly occurring “every day” without resolution. The caller is seeking legal assistance to rectify the situation and obtain compensation for the harm they have endured as a result of this prolonged mistreatment. No physical injuries were reported, and no specific documentation or evidence was mentioned during the intake. The claimant is open to speaking with a law firm to explore legal remedies and to hold the responsible parties accountable for the alleged mishandling of their union representation.

In Fort Myers, Florida, the claimant was involved in an auto accident the night before the call while driving home after visiting a friend’s house. The claimant was traveling down the road when a truck safely passed through a stop sign, but a van behind the truck failed to stop and entered the intersection without yielding. The claimant, unable to stop in time, collided with the van. Law enforcement arrived at the scene and provided a case number but did not share any determination of fault. No police report details were discussed with the claimant at the time. The claimant was driving a 2015 Audi and did not report any immediate injuries at the scene. However, by the following morning, the claimant experienced significant neck pain, suggestive of a potential whiplash injury. The claimant has not yet sought medical treatment but expressed willingness to pursue care if covered by the at-fault party’s insurance. Photographs of the vehicle damage may exist, though no dashcam footage is available. The claimant is now seeking legal assistance to recover for both property damage and any necessary medical treatment. The law firm is expected to follow up promptly to provide guidance on next steps.

On the day of the call in Ocala, Florida, the claimant was involved in a motor vehicle accident when another driver, allegedly distracted by their phone, ran a light and struck the claimant’s 2020 Toyota Camry, causing significant damage to both doors. The claimant reported feeling possible whiplash symptoms immediately after the accident but had not yet sought medical treatment at the time of the call. The incident was attended by a local sheriff’s deputy, who advised the parties to exchange information but did not generate a formal police report due to jurisdictional limitations. The claimant is concerned about potential out-of-pocket medical expenses and expressed a desire to continue working without missing time for doctor’s appointments. They were advised that legal assistance could help arrange medical treatment through a chiropractor or other facility at no upfront cost, and that any future treatment costs, as well as vehicle repair expenses, could potentially be recovered from the at-fault party. Photographic evidence of the vehicle damage is available, but no dashcam footage exists. The claimant is now awaiting contact from a law firm to proceed with the case and to discuss possible next steps for both medical care and property damage recovery.

In Marrero, Louisiana, during an unspecified date between January and July of 2024, the claimant’s 2004 Infiniti G35 was parked when it was struck by a driver who was allegedly intoxicated and lacked insurance. The vehicle sustained extensive rear-end damage, resulting in a total loss estimated at approximately $9,000. Due to having liability-only coverage, the claimant received no compensation from their insurer and was forced to sell the vehicle at a significant loss. Although the police provided an item number at the time of the report, it has since been misplaced. The claimant indicated the incident was documented at the Westbank office in Jefferson Parish. No citation was issued to the claimant, and since the vehicle was unoccupied, no physical injuries occurred. The claimant is now seeking legal assistance to determine whether financial recovery is possible from the uninsured driver or through other legal channels.

While shopping at a Walmart in South Carolina, the caller placed three canned drinks in the child seat portion of her shopping cart. As she proceeded down the soda aisle, one of the cans fell from the cart and struck her right toe, causing immediate pain and significant bleeding. A Walmart employee witnessed the incident and helped her locate a manager to complete an incident report. The store employee then paid for her groceries, and she exited the store. Shortly after, the caller went to the emergency room, where x-rays showed a deep internal bruise on the injured toe. She was prescribed pain medication and given a protective boot, which she continues to use. Although she does not have security footage, she has documentation from the hospital and an incident report from Walmart. She confirmed that her insurance paid for the ER visit but is now seeking legal assistance for potential damages related to the store’s liability and ongoing pain.

On March 13, 2025, in a small town in Missouri, the caller was rear-ended by a vehicle believed to be a Toyota 4x4 truck insured by AAA. The claimant was driving a 2009 Ford Taurus and did not report any injuries at the time. The insurance investigation conducted by the caller’s insurer concluded that the caller was not at fault, and the claim was forwarded to AAA. Despite having a valid claim number and a fault determination, the claimant has received no communication or resolution from AAA, leading to frustration and ongoing vehicle repair issues. The claimant is now seeking legal assistance to understand the status of the claim, enforce repair responsibilities, and ensure proper handling of the case. There is no photographic or witness evidence, but insurance findings may support the claim.

In March 2025, a workplace injury occurred in Cleveland, Ohio, resulting in two broken bones. The caller was initially cleared to return to work by hospital staff, only to later discover the severity of the injuries, which required hospitalization and ongoing rehabilitation. The individual is now recovering in a rehab facility and recently received a notice for a hearing scheduled on June 18th, prompting urgent need for legal assistance. There is uncertainty about current legal representation, and the caller is seeking an attorney to review the case and provide guidance, particularly regarding the hearing and possible compensation for the injuries sustained while on the job. Medical documentation and official notices are available to support the claim.

On June 4, 2025, in Piedmont, Missouri, a property damage incident occurred when a driver, identified as Brian Diamond, crashed and destroyed the caller’s mailbox. The collision did not involve any personal injuries, but the mailbox was completely taken out as a result of the accident. The caller provided the insurance policy number for the at-fault driver and obtained an incident number from the Missouri Highway Patrol, which should aid in verifying the details of the accident. The issue at hand is limited to property damage, and the caller is seeking assistance from an attorney to have the mailbox replaced. The matter appears straightforward, and there is a clear request for compensation for the destroyed property.

The caller from Yonkers, New York reported a product liability case involving a recalled batch of Jif peanut butter. On May 17, 2025, the product—purchased months earlier and left unopened—was consumed, leading to severe respiratory distress. The individual was forced to drive themselves to the hospital, where they were treated with oxygen and emergency medications. They remained under medical supervision until May 18. Only after returning home did the caller discover, through online research, that the unit code on the peanut butter (5150025516) matched an active product recall. The product is reportedly still being sold in stores, which has raised serious public health concerns. The individual is seeking financial compensation for the distress and medical hardship, as well as legal action to ensure the product is removed from shelves to prevent further harm. Although expenses were covered by Medicaid and Medicare, the caller emphasized the life-threatening nature of the event and retained the contaminated product for potential lab testing to confirm contamination such as Salmonella. They also noted efforts to contact local attorneys but faced difficulty articulating their case due to limited familiarity with legal processes. This appears to be a viable product liability claim involving a recalled consumer good that resulted in emergency medical treatment.

The caller is seeking legal assistance regarding a suspected mechanic service scam that occurred in Atlanta, Georgia. After experiencing a check engine light issue, the claimant took their vehicle to a repair shop that charged $700 for what was presented as a necessary fix. However, the very next day, the check engine light returned, and the vehicle showed the same performance as before. Upon returning, the shop redirected the claimant to a second affiliated location, where a different technician corrected the same issue—free of charge—stating that the original part installed was incorrect. This second shop documented the problem and confirmed that the initial location may have misdiagnosed or improperly repaired the vehicle. Notably, this second repair was noted to cost roughly one-third the price, but no additional fee was charged due to internal handling. The claimant has supporting documents from both visits and believes the original $700 charge was unjustified, given that the issue persisted and was resolved elsewhere within the same business network. They are now seeking an attorney’s help to determine whether a claim for reimbursement or deceptive service practices can be pursued.

In this case, the caller was involved in a motor vehicle accident while driving a company-owned 2014 Dodge Caravan for Mellencamp Funeral Home. The collision occurred while traveling eastbound on I-10 in the far-right lane. The vehicle was struck by a Nissan Maxima. The incident was reported and documented via an official police report, which the claimant retains as evidence. At the time of the accident, no immediate injuries were reported; however, the individual is now pursuing compensation for potential medical expenses and unresolved damages. Attempts to reach the responsible party’s insurance provider have been unsuccessful, leading to a delay in any form of resolution or reimbursement. The caller is now seeking legal support to recover damages related to the accident and initiate proper claims through legal channels. No previous legal action has been taken, and all contact information has been provided for attorney follow-up.

A Pennsylvania resident is seeking legal support due to severe adverse effects linked to long-term use of prescription pain medication, specifically oxycodone and OxyContin. The individual has been taking the medication for many years and recently discovered, through a physician, that it caused damage to the pituitary gland. This damage has resulted in a complete loss of testosterone production, leading to chronic erectile dysfunction and significant disruption to personal life — including the breakdown of a marriage and severe emotional distress. The caller reported that no reimbursement has been received for the resulting medical or psychological damages and is hoping to pursue a claim based on pharmaceutical liability and medical harm. Supporting medical documentation is available and can be obtained from hospital and physician records. The caller gave consent for the information to be shared with legal professionals and requested further communication via email.

In November 2024, a Virginia resident filed a claim under an extended auto warranty through Ox Car Care for issues with their Volvo. Despite the claim being submitted before the policy’s expiration, the vehicle was never repaired, and the claim was later canceled due to a cited 90-day delay. The car remains unrepaired at AMCOL Auto Services, and no reimbursement has been issued for repairs or related expenses. The claimant has documentation from the repair facility and communication records indicating that the issue was reported and unresolved well before the policy’s expiration on February 14, 2025. The cancellation timing and lack of action raise concerns of bad faith and potential breach of contract by the warranty provider. The company involved is based in California, but all relevant events occurred in Virginia. The caller is pursuing legal assistance to recover damages, hold the warranty provider accountable, and potentially seek compensation for emotional distress and financial burden caused by the prolonged inaction. Supporting documents and service records are available for attorney review.

Potential client contacted Get A Claim regarding a mortgage-related financial issue with Wells Fargo. He stated that from 2012 to 2019, Wells Fargo wrongfully withdrew payments for accidental death insurance that he never knowingly enrolled in. He mentioned receiving a check from Wells Fargo for approximately $6,000, which he initially assumed was reimbursement. However, after reviewing additional documentation with his daughter, he became concerned that accepting the funds may have waived further rights or claims. Complicating the matter, his late wife’s name was also on the mortgage, but no compensation was issued on her behalf, despite the likelihood that the unauthorized charges applied to both parties. He is particularly troubled by the lack of clarity in the documentation and his inability to fully comprehend the legal implications due to vision or literacy challenges. His mortgage was originally with another provider and later sold to Wells Fargo, which has since sold it again. He is seeking clarity, potential legal representation, and restitution for unauthorized deductions, as well as investigation into whether additional reimbursement or action is due regarding his late wife. He has indicated a willingness to call back to complete the intake process, as the initial call was cut short due to technical issues on his phone.

Raymond Leslie reported a theft of personal property from a storage facility in Indianapolis, Indiana, that occurred on March 1, 2025. He is seeking legal assistance to recover the value of the stolen items and explore a claim for pain and suffering stemming from the incident. He believes the facility may have been negligent in securing the premises, which led to the loss of his belongings. Raymond confirmed that he has documentation and identification related to the storage facility, as well as evidence to support his claim. He has not received any reimbursement or compensation from the facility or any involved party to date. His request for representation includes both recovery of losses and a potential claim for negligence-related emotional and financial hardship. The case involves property loss and possible breach of duty of care by the storage provider, especially if security measures were inadequate. With documented evidence and a clear timeline, this may present a viable civil claim for theft-related damages and facility liability.

On March 6, 2025, Lenard Mariz was involved in a vehicle accident in San Antonio, Texas, when his car was struck by a school bus. Mr. Mariz has identified the school bus driver and possesses clear photo evidence of the damage sustained. He has also secured an official incident report and retains full contact information for both the school and the responsible party’s insurance company. Despite this, the insurance company is giving him the runaround — delaying communication and refusing to cover the cost of repairs, even though all necessary evidence and documentation have been submitted.

Wynd Johnson contacted regarding an incident at MUSC in Florence, South Carolina, in 2021, where he alleges the hospital committed medical malpractice by failing to treat his diagnosed mental health conditions. He states that while hospitalized, he received no psychiatric consultation, medication, or mental health intervention despite having a longstanding history of mental illness. As a result, he claims his condition has significantly worsened, affecting multiple areas of his life and contributing to ongoing instability. Wynd possesses supporting medical records, including documents from Pee Dee Mental Health Center, which outline his psychiatric diagnoses and confirm his prior treatment history. He is scheduled to undergo a psychiatric evaluation and mental health assessment at a hospital the day following the call, indicating that his condition remains serious and untreated. He reported receiving no reimbursement or follow-up support from MUSC since the incident. The caller is seeking to pursue a malpractice lawsuit for the alleged failure to diagnose and treat during his hospital stay, which he believes constitutes negligence and a violation of medical duty of care. His case centers on omission of treatment in a vulnerable patient population, supported by clear documentation of a preexisting mental health condition and subsequent decline following hospital negligence.

Ruby Thomas called to inquire about a potential lawsuit related to long-term use of Zantac, which she believes contributed to serious ongoing health issues. She stated she took Zantac daily for several years, beginning at a younger age, and emphasized that her pharmacy records fully document her usage. Ruby has used the same pharmacy chain throughout her life and mentioned that it holds comprehensive proof of her prescriptions. She also confirmed she is willing and able to obtain those records if needed. Although Ruby declined to share detailed medical diagnoses during the call, she mentioned Zantac caused excessive acid and “a lot of problems,” strongly linking the drug to her current condition. She also made clear that she is motivated by health-related damages, not financial gain, and emphasized her lifelong work history and independence from public assistance. She was cautious about sharing full medical documentation until speaking directly with a legal representative and requested to wait until a lawyer contacts her before proceeding further. Ruby’s call demonstrates a credible interest in pursuing a claim based on documented Zantac use and related health deterioration. She appears to be a reliable, well-spoken claimant who possesses both pharmacy records and potentially supporting medical documentation, making her case worth reviewing for further evaluation under ongoing Zantac-related litigation.

Carol Sullivan contacted regarding a serious injury her husband sustained while being transported to a PACE adult day care program affiliated with Prisma Hospital in Greenwood, South Carolina. Her husband, who is 6’4”, 289 pounds, and suffers from Alzheimer’s, was picked up by a petite female driver who was reportedly distracted and on her phone during pickup. Carol expressed concern that the driver failed to park in a safe location or provide proper assistance. About 90 minutes later, the driver called to inform her that he had fallen due to a van door swinging back on him, causing a head injury. Initially told that he was “fine,” Carol later took her husband to the hospital after his condition deteriorated. He was diagnosed with a concussion, and since the incident, she reports that his cognitive condition has significantly worsened. Carol was not notified by the day care program after the incident and has received no reimbursement or medical support. She reports that his headaches have continued, and doctors have warned it could take months or years for him to recover—if at all—especially given his pre-existing neurological condition. Carol is seeking legal assistance to determine whether PACE or its staff may be liable for negligence in the transport and handling of her husband. She believes the staff failed in their duty of care and that the program’s lack of follow-up or accountability has left her to manage significant caregiving responsibilities and medical needs alone. She is currently without an email address but expressed deep concern and a strong desire to speak with an attorney about filing a claim.

On November 4, 2024, Stacey Fisk was involved in a low-speed rear-end collision when her vehicle struck a Chevy pickup truck that had stalled without brake lights at a green light. The other driver exited his vehicle, apologized, and both parties exchanged information without involving law enforcement. Stacey’s 2009 Saturn Sky Roadster suffered cosmetic damage, which she promptly reported to Farmers Insurance, who then deposited $3,689 to cover repairs. She took the vehicle to Crossroads Collision in Big Spring, TX for an estimate and left it there. The following day, Stacey was contacted by an insurance adjuster named Nick Cain, who informed her that the vehicle had been deemed a total loss and insisted she release possession of the vehicle so he could take photos and proceed with the claim. Under the impression that cooperation would expedite the repair process, Stacey agreed. Without ever receiving the repair estimate, she was told her vehicle had been salvaged and would require a $3,800 payment to recover it. She disputes the valuation, asserting that the repair cost was $4,689 and the car’s market value was $7,895, leaving a difference of only $1,000, which she was never allowed to pay out-of-pocket. Despite her objections and emotional distress—including nearly losing her job due to transportation issues—her vehicle was later returned unannounced and in pieces, after she had already secured a different vehicle. Stacey states that she still owes $12,000 on the Saturn Sky, and that her insurance company has failed to pay the $6,000 settlement promised to her lender. She believes the adjuster may have had a personal interest in her vehicle and acted in bad faith by depriving her of the opportunity to repair it, ultimately causing severe financial harm and emotional distress. This case may involve insurance fraud, bad faith practices, and potential misappropriation of property.

Martin Flores described a disturbing incident involving alleged police misconduct in Coffee City, Texas, around mid-2023. He was being transported by police due to an outstanding warrant and, upon arriving at the police station, asked to use the restroom. As Martin is diabetic and amputated in one leg, he required assistance. The officer reportedly attempted to carry him into the station but, after Martin involuntarily passed gas while being lifted, the officer violently threw him down, resulting in serious neck and back injuries. Martin states he was taken to the hospital and later required surgery to his neck to avoid paralysis. Following surgery, Martin stayed in a nursing home for rehabilitation and has since struggled to access consistent care. He is legally blind, cannot read or write, and has no reliable access to transportation, which led a previous attorney to drop his case due to missed appointments. Since then, he has moved to Tyler, Texas, to gain access to public transit and proper medical care. He reports that a specialist confirmed he needed surgery to remove part of a damaged vertebra to prevent spinal cord damage. Martin possesses partial video evidence of the incident and believes bodycam footage may exist showing the event and what followed. However, he reports the police department may have cut or failed to record key portions. He has not received any compensation for the incident and continues to live alone in difficult conditions. His case represents a potential claim for excessive force and civil rights violations, with long-term physical and emotional impact compounded by lack of institutional support.

Anita L. James called to inquire about participating in a lawsuit related to her long-term use of Zantac and a recent diagnosis of rectal and cervical cancer. She stated that she had taken Zantac consistently for several years and is currently undergoing treatment for both forms of cancer. Her interest in pursuing legal action is based on the potential link between Zantac and carcinogenic contamination, which has been the subject of national litigation. Anita has not received any reimbursement for her ongoing medical expenses and expressed concern about the financial burden of her treatment. She indicated that she can obtain a printout from the pharmacy confirming her prescription history with Zantac, which could serve as key supporting evidence in her case. Although technical difficulties affected communication during the call, Anita was cooperative and willing to provide documentation. She does not currently have her own email address but plans to follow up through her daughter. This case presents a clear instance of product liability with personal health consequences, and Anita appears to be a motivated claimant with a reasonable basis to explore a claim against the drug manufacturer.

Orlin William O’Brien contacted GetAClaim regarding a severe injury to his left eye allegedly caused by a retina specialist during a procedure in Grapevine, Texas. The caller had been undergoing long-term treatment involving injections to both eyes at a retina center in Fort Worth, TX, but was referred to another facility for further care. During one of these injections, the physician tore his retina, resulting in complete and permanent loss of vision in his left eye. Orlin described undergoing follow-up surgeries and continued injections over several years, though none restored vision to the damaged eye. His right eye remains functional, but the trauma and extent of procedures to both eyes has caused emotional distress and physical hardship. Despite these outcomes, he has not received any reimbursement or compensation for the surgical costs or the permanent injury. The caller has medical records available from the original retina center and is able to identify the doctor involved. His case presents a strong claim of procedural negligence during a sensitive eye treatment, with long-term disability and medical documentation to support his allegations. Orlin is seeking legal guidance to pursue justice and compensation for the irreversible damage caused during the referral procedure.

On the evening of March 29, 2025, Robert Vick was struck by another vehicle while proceeding through the intersection of 53rd Street and Raytown Road in Raytown, Missouri. Although there were no reported injuries, Robert stated that the other driver appeared to be heavily intoxicated, and begged him not to call the police. In an act of leniency, Robert agreed and no formal report was filed at the time of the accident. However, the collision caused clear vehicle damage, including a damaged front driver-side fender and misalignment issues on Robert’s 2007 Yukon XL Denali. Robert has retained extensive documentation, including photos of the other driver’s vehicle, driver’s license, and insurance card, as well as his own matching records. He has not yet had the vehicle fully assessed but confirmed the truck is driving unevenly and will require repairs. The driver who struck him admitted fault at the scene, and the positioning of the vehicles clearly supports Robert’s account of what happened. Robert is now seeking legal help to recover repair costs and potentially hold the other party accountable, especially given the implication of intoxicated driving and admitted fault. Despite initially choosing not to involve law enforcement, he appears organized and ready to proceed, making this a strong case for civil recovery based on negligence and property damage.

Loana Edmonds received a spinal pain stimulator implant in 2018, which was recently identified as part of an official medical device recall. She has since experienced worsening pain, functional complications, and overall decline in her condition, prompting her current doctor to recommend full removal of the implant. A corrective surgery is scheduled for April 14, 2025, with no confirmation yet as to whether her medical provider will cover the procedure’s cost. Loana is primarily interested in pursuing a product liability claim against the manufacturer of the recalled implant, citing physical suffering and disruption to her quality of life. While her doctor acknowledged the device must be removed due to its failure, she is still unsure whether the hospital or insurance will take responsibility for her medical expenses. She also confirmed that her device’s serial number matches one on the official recall list, providing a clear foundation for liability. She has preserved key documentation, including the original product packaging and recall details, which will help substantiate her claim. Loana appears cooperative and ready to proceed, and her situation presents a compelling case of manufacturer negligence with the potential for escalating medical costs and long-term damage. If the hospital declines coverage, additional liability concerns may extend to her care provider as well.

On March 16, 2025, Gregory Greer, a 71-year-old resident of Chicago, sustained injuries while attempting to board a CTA Bus #9 near 82nd Street and Ashland Avenue. According to Gregory, the bus was not lowered to accommodate boarding, causing him to trip and fall as he stepped up. He suffered a leg injury with visible bleeding, prompting the bus driver to immediately stop the vehicle, call a supervisor, and contact emergency services. Gregory was transported to Little Company of Mary Hospital for treatment and has retained medical documentation from the visit. As a result of the incident, Gregory reports both physical injury and property damage, including a broken phone and additional out-of-pocket costs. He has not received any reimbursement from the transit authority or insurance and is currently without reliable means of communication, relying on borrowed phones. He estimates $140 in emergency room expenses and approximately $200 ( but it's more likely that traditional hospital expenses would far exceed $4000 for Emergency care ) to replace the damaged phone. He also mentioned that the incident was officially reported and recorded by the bus operator, who witnessed his injuries and initiated the response. Gregory is seeking legal representation to explore options for filing a claim against the transit authority for negligence and failure to accommodate a safe boarding environment. With the bus driver as a potential witness, recorded surveillance, and hospital records supporting his account, this case presents a strong foundation for a public transit injury claim. Gregory is cooperative, detail-oriented, and open to attorney guidance on how to proceed.

On June 26, 2023, Willie McNell was involved in a serious vehicle accident on North Church Street in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, while driving his 1994 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 southbound. A truck pulled out in front of him, causing him to crash and total his vehicle. Although there was no direct contact between the vehicles, the maneuver forced Willie into an unavoidable collision. Police arrived approximately 5 to 10 minutes later, and a report was filed at the scene. Willie confirmed he obtained the at-fault party’s information and sought immediate medical attention. The incident resulted in multiple injuries and extensive losses. Willie reported approximately $100,000 in combined damages and medical expenses following the wreck. He emphasized the severity of the crash and the financial burden that has followed. He also stated that his vehicle was beyond repair and described the damage as total. This case involves strong elements of negligent driving by the opposing party, supported by a police report, documented injuries, and clear financial losses. Willie has retained all relevant documents and appears motivated to pursue legal action. His case presents a clear basis for pursuing compensation under North Carolina personal injury and liability laws, particularly given the scale of medical expenses and property loss.

On November 4, 2023, Harrison underwent a combined umbilical hernia repair and tummy tuck procedure at a Mayo Clinic-affiliated facility in Wisconsin. Within days of removing his bandages, he noticed signs of improper surgical execution, including a misaligned and jagged incision, insufficient removal of excess skin, and failure to reposition the belly button, which may have directly contributed to the rerupture of the hernia. He was later billed $5,000 for that complication alone and described the entire procedure as poorly and incompletely performed. Harrison attempted to address his concerns through the hospital’s Patient Experience department, explicitly requesting a refund and stating that he did not trust the original provider to perform a revision. However, the clinic declined his request on three separate occasions, each time deferring to the surgeon’s own self-assessment that “excellent care” had been provided. He has preserved a significant amount of evidence, including MyChart correspondence, messages with staff, and a large collection of photos and videos documenting the outcome. Harrison has found it difficult to secure legal representation locally, citing that many attorneys are unwilling to take on a case against a well-known institution. He is now actively seeking help from an attorney outside of his immediate region who is willing to pursue reimbursement and corrective justice for what he believes is a clear instance of surgical negligence and institutional failure.

Krista Smith was involved in a serious vehicle incident around 11:00 PM in October 2024 while driving her 2006 Ford Mustang on Highway 99 in Oroville, California. While traveling at approximately 65 mph, a driveline from a semi-truck suddenly detached and struck the front of her vehicle before becoming lodged underneath it. The impact blew out her tires and caused major undercarriage damage, rendering the car nearly totaled. The truck driver was reportedly unaware of the incident and continued driving. Following the crash, Krista experienced physical injuries and is now seeking coverage for medical expenses and lost wages related to the accident. No legal action was taken at the time of the incident, and no claim has yet been filed against the trucking company, despite the clear mechanical failure and unsafe conditions that led to the crash. She is actively pursuing her options for holding the commercial carrier accountable. This case presents strong potential for a commercial negligence claim, with evidence of mechanical failure leading to highway debris and physical harm to the claimant. The combination of property loss, personal injury, and financial hardship from missed work further strengthens the legal basis for pursuing compensation. Krista is seeking legal support to begin the claims process and recover damages tied to the accident.

On March 3, 2025, Damaris Vasquez underwent a scheduled hysterectomy at a hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee, to remove fibroids, her uterus, and a fallopian tube. The procedure, which was supposed to last five hours, extended to over nine and a half hours after a surgical error led to her ureter being cut. This unexpected complication forced her into a second emergency surgery, required a blood transfusion, and she was later discharged with a catheter and the possibility of kidney damage due to the injury. She reports that one of the medical providers involved in her care verbally admitted that the injury was a mistake and acknowledged it as medical malpractice. Upon her discharge, Damaris received incomplete medical paperwork, omitting key surgical details and only listing routine medication notes. She currently has at least nine surgical incisions, continues to experience pain and emotional trauma, and has been left uncertain about her long-term recovery due to ongoing catheter use and delayed follow-up care. This case presents a compelling instance of surgical negligence, with a clear chain of events leading to physical harm, unnecessary procedures, and emotional distress, compounded by an explicit admission of fault. Damaris has retained her medical records, photographic evidence of her injuries, and details of those involved. She is seeking legal representation to hold the responsible parties accountable and ensure her experience is addressed appropriately under malpractice law.

Linda Parker called seeking legal assistance after suffering a workplace injury at McDonald’s in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. On October 28, 2024, she struck the top of her foot against a steel table, resulting in a diagnosed concussion on her foot and significant pain that now prevents her from wearing shoes comfortably. A procedure has been recommended by a foot specialist, and she continues to deal with the physical effects of the injury. Despite the severity of the incident, Linda received little to no guidance from her employer. She was never informed about COBRA or her rights under workers’ comp and had to file her claim independently. Although her medical bills were initially covered, she was later informed that her workers’ compensation provider would no longer assist her, leaving her without support. She’s now navigating the system alone, without a clear understanding of what steps to take next. At 66 years old, Linda has limited experience with technology and paperwork, yet she has managed to gather all relevant documentation related to her injury, including medical records and employer details. Her case reflects a broader issue of potential employer neglect and mismanagement of employee injury claims. She is actively looking for an attorney who can help her hold the responsible parties accountable and ensure she receives the care and compensation she deserves.

Glenn Eaton called GetAClaim after finding their number online. He’s looking to file a claim against Teva Pharmaceuticals, relating to opioid prescriptions he took over a six-year period, totaling more than 6,200 pills. The medications were dispensed by Activus, a company he says was under Teva. He has extensive medical and prescription records, including NDC numbers for four years of prescriptions from Osco Pharmacy, but lacks NDCs for an additional two years of prescriptions filled at Walgreens between 2011–2013. He remembers a brand switch during that time that prompted him to return to his doctor due to ineffectiveness. Glenn is 66 years old, managing multiple opioid-related claims, including successful filings against Endo and Purdue. He’s concerned about the complexity of the process, his limited computer skills, and difficulties with gathering certain documentation like NDC numbers or old pill bottles from Walgreens. He has medical records ready and is seeking help to ensure this Teva-related claim is submitted correctly.

Case Summary: Alleged Medical Negligence Leading to Physical, Emotional, and Financial Harm On January 8, 2024, the patient underwent a mastectomy performed by the first doctor in Illinois. The procedure aimed to remove cancerous tissue but resulted in apparent negligence, as excess tissue was left behind. This oversight not only failed to address the intended medical issue but also caused significant disfigurement, necessitating a second surgery to restore the patient’s visual and structural appearance. The patient endured substantial emotional and mental distress due to the disfigurement and the extended recovery process. This has compounded the psychological challenges of coping with an initial cancer diagnosis and treatment. The situation has severely impacted her quality of life, contributing to a prolonged period of emotional suffering. Additionally, the patient experienced financial hardship as the estimated cost of the corrective surgery ranges between $60,000 and $80,000. This financial burden has further strained her well-being. Compounding this, she lost her job as a result of the time she had to step away for the initial procedure, the follow-up corrective surgery, and the recovery periods. This loss of income has significantly increased the financial and emotional toll on her and her family. The patient has gathered substantial evidence to support her claims, including photographs documenting the results of the first procedure and the subsequent disfigurement, as well as medical records and other relevant documentation. These materials clearly illustrate the inadequacy of the initial surgical outcome and its aftermath. This case represents a multifaceted issue involving physical harm, psychological distress, and financial loss. It warrants careful legal evaluation to determine the appropriate course of action for holding the responsible parties accountable and seeking fair compensation for the damages incurred.

The claimant, states that her former landlady demolished her mobile home without prior notice or consent. Approximately two years prior, the claimant and her husband vacated the mobile home due to unlivable conditions caused by an unresolved electrical issue. She signed over ownership of the mobile home to the landlady after falling behind on rent, as their funds were redirected to kerosene heating during winters without electricity. Despite the transfer of ownership, the claimant was not informed about the demolition and was not given an opportunity to retrieve her belongings, resulting in the loss of all her personal property, appliances, and sentimental items. She questions whether the demolition was legal and seeks clarification regarding her rights and any potential remedies.

Vehicle was damaged by a towing company. Vehicle: 2019 HYUN Kona Limited AWD w/Dual Clutch Transmission 4D UTV 4-1.6L Turbocharged Gasoline Gasoline Direct Injection GRAY Description of what happened: Towing company while towing the owners vehicle damaged it significantly while moving it. All the towing companies information and contact information should be available on a police report but they refuse to pay for the damages. The innocent parties insurance did attempt to contact the towing company to get them to pay for damages which ended up falling flat. The total damage was over $19,000 It also appears that this towing company has had similar issues with other vehicle owners. The vehicle owner here in this case said they're aware of other owners that had similar issues and they have their contact information. So there is a possible opportunity for a class action lawsuit.